- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
GANTT v. SENTRY INSURANCE
Factual and Procedural Background
This opinion compiles references to multiple cases, including Gantt v. Sentry Insurance, Kinlaw v. State of California, Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court, and others, as part of a tracking mechanism pending review by the Supreme Court. Several cases were transferred between appellate districts, and some reviews were granted or dismissed. The opinion primarily serves to track these cases rather than address a singular dispute or factual scenario.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt v. Sentry Insurance | Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court | Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 612 to permit tracking. |
| Kinlaw v. State of California | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 54 Cal.3d 326 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 1325 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Brodehl v. Becker | Cause transferred with directions | Transferred to Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District; subsequent opinion not certified for publication. |
| Monterey County v. Cornejo | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 1271 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 987 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Woosley v. State of California | Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court | Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 647 to permit tracking. |
| Mikail v. Sauerwald | Review dismissed and cause remanded | Review dismissed on August 29, 1991; cause remanded to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One. |
| Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 121 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| County of San Bernardino v. State of California | Review dismissed and cause remanded | Review dismissed on June 28, 1991; cause remanded to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three. |
| Judah v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co. | Review granted and later dismissed as moot | Review granted April 19, 1990; dismissed as moot May 30, 1991. |
| Walker v. Superior Court | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 257 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Kizer v. County of San Mateo | Reference to Supreme Court opinion | See 53 Cal.3d 139 for Supreme Court opinion. |
| Ford v. Gouin | Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court | Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 684 to permit tracking. |
| Van Meter v. American Motor Sports Assn. | Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court | Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 707 to permit tracking. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The court's reasoning is primarily procedural, focusing on tracking the status of multiple cases pending Supreme Court review. The opinion references the transfer of causes, dismissal of reviews, and reprinting of opinions without change to facilitate monitoring. No substantive legal analysis or application of law to facts is provided within this text.
Holding and Implications
DISPOSED OF
The decision serves to update the procedural posture of various cases rather than establish new legal precedent or resolve substantive issues. Its direct effect is to inform parties and courts of the current status of the referenced cases pending Supreme Court review. No broader legal implications are discussed.
REVIEWS GRANTED
Alert