- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ARMSTRONG v. PETSCHE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Apr 26, 1991
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendants are entitled to dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The Dram Shop Act does not create a cause of action in favor of one injured as a result of his own intoxicated condition (Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, 73 N.Y.2d 629, 635; Mitchell v. The Shoals, 19 N.Y.2d 338, 340-341). Further, there is no common-law liability on the part of a tavern owner for injuries sustained by a voluntarily intoxicated patron off the premises, outside the tavern owner's control (Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, supra, at 636-637; Wellcome v. Student Coop., 125 A.D.2d 393).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.