- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MARDIROS v. GHALY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jul 12, 1991
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff's responses to designated items in defendants' demand for a bill of particulars were sufficient. The court's order denying defendants' motion for reargument is not appealable (see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 A.D.2d 214).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.