Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE v. MEADOWS

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 4, 1992

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

MOYER, C.J., HOLMES, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.