- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MORALES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 21, 1993
By pleading guilty, defendant waived his right to argue, on appeal, that the Trial Judge should have recused herself (People v. Lazzaro, 180 A.D.2d 696), that his motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 should have been granted (People v. Jackson, 178 A.D.2d 305, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 948; cf., People v. Sutton, 80 N.Y.2d 273), and that his motion for severance should have been granted (People v Shepphard, 177 A.D.2d 668). Were we to reach these arguments, we would find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.