Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ADV. UNITED EXPRESSWAYS v. EASTMAN KODAK CO

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Apr 22, 1993
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 91-1320.

Attorney(S)

Byron D. Olsen, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, Barbara R. Kueppers, Minneapolis, MN, for Eastman Kodak. Nicholas J. DiMichael, Richard D. Fortin, Donelan, Cleary, Wood Maser, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae — Nat. Indus. Transp. League. Judith A. Albert, Atty., I.C.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae I.C.C. Daniel J. Sweeney, McCarthy, Sweeney Harkaway, Washington, DC, Paul O. Taylor, Minneapolis, MN, David G. Sperry, Independence, MO, for amicus curiae — Health Personal Care Dist. Conference, et al.

JUDGES

Irving Loeb Goldberg

E. Grady Jolly

Jacques Loeb Wiener

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion June 26, 5th Cir., 1992 965 F.2d 1347)

BY THE COURT:

To the extent that our opinion of June 26, 1992, 965 F.2d 1347, is in conflict with Reiter v. Cooper, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1213, 122 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993), it has been overruled. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The case is thus REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in the light of Reiter and of our opinion.

Finally, no active judge having requested that the court be polled, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x