PEOPLE v. HARRINGTON

Defendant's only contention on this appeal is that the $500 fine and concurrent sentences of one year in jail are harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentences ultimately imposed, which are less than the harshest possible. Under these circumstances, and in light of defendant's criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 A.D.2d 780, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.