- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. WHYTE
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Aug 2, 1993
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J. Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).
WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ., dissenting.
We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell's dissenting opinion, reported at 265 N.J. Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992). For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O'HERN and STEIN — 4
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.