- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. FULTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Mar 11, 1994
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err by imposing sentence upon defendant after he was removed from the courtroom. Although a defendant has the right to be present and heard at sentencing (CPL 380.40, 380.50 Crim. Proc.), he forfeits that right by engaging in "obstreperous conduct" (People v. Stroman, 36 N.Y.2d 939, 940; see also, People v. Herrera, 160 A.D.2d 416, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 789). The conduct of defendant at sentencing was sufficiently "obstreperous" to effect a forfeiture of his right to be present.
The contention that defendant's sentence is harsh and excessive is without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.