KELLEY v. ANALYTAB PRODUCTS

Substantial evidence supports respondent's determination that the reasons appellant gave for terminating the complainant's employment were pretexts for sex discrimination (see, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 179-182, 183).

We find the award for mental anguish excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.