- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. CAVELL
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Oct 18, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
FOTI, J.
This matter is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. We previously considered it in State v. Cavell, 34 Conn. App. 276, 641 A.2d 426, remanded for reconsideration, 231 Conn. 902, 645 A.2d 1021 (1994). The Supreme Court ordered us to reconsider our judgment in light of State v. Robinson, 230 Conn. 591, 646 A.2d 118 (1994). Having reconsidered, we affirm our prior judgment.
FOTI, J.
In this opinion HEIMAN, J., concurred.
O'CONNELL, J., dissenting.
For the reasons set forth in State v. Cavell, supra, 34 Conn. App. 295-303, ( O'Connell, J., dissenting), I adhere to my dissent from that decision.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.