66 DRIVE-IN v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 66 Drive-In appeals the dismissal of its petition against the guarantors of a development agreement for interest on plaintiff's condemnation award after the developer abandoned the condemnation of plaintiff's land.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16 (b).