- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SUTTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 23, 1995
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The testimony concerning the defendant's uncharged crime and the introduction of the domestic violence form were relevant and material to explaining a motive and intent for the subsequent homicide (see, People v. Hutchinson, 179 A.D.2d 679; People v Hill, 163 A.D.2d 813; People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or relate to errors that are harmless. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.