RAMESAR v. SUROOJ

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court properly denied the defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer to assert three counterclaims against the plaintiff-father for contribution and/or indemnification. The defendants' proposed amended answer failed to allege "the type of affirmative conduct needed by a parent to remove this case from the general rule that mere negligent supervision of a child is not actionable" (Navaro v Ieraci, 214 A.D.2d 713, 714). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.