ROMAN v. KONIS

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' motion, denominated as one for renewal and reargument, was, in effect, a motion to reargue, since the purportedly new material could have been submitted in support of the original motion to restore the case to the trial calendar ( see, Taylor v. Brooklyn Hosp., 187 A.D.2d 714, 715; Echeverri v. Flushing Hosp. Med. Ctr., 123 A.D.2d 818, 819). Consequently, the order denying the motion is not appealable ( see, Ackermann v. Town of Riverhead, 245 A.D.2d 404; Castellitto v. Atlantic Pac. Co., 244 A.D.2d 379; Guigui v. Bonnie Castle Resort, 239 A.D.2d 315).

Miller, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.