MATTER OF PERSICO v. INC. VIL. OF MINEOLA

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination under review, which revoked a previously-issued special use permit due to noncompliance with the stated conditions, was supported by substantial evidence, and was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( see generally, Matter of Buitenkant v. Robohm, 122 A.D.2d 791).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.