NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO. v. VARDA, INC

Plaintiff's motion to quash was properly denied, since the information sought by defendants' subpoena duces tecum was not "`utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry'" (Ayubo v. Eastman Kodak Co., 158 A.D.2d 641, 642; Pagan v. City of New York, 180 A.D.2d 545). We have considered plaintiff's additional arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.