MATTER OF FRENKE v. FRENKE

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in admitting a decision of the Social Security Administration as some evidence, but not prima facie evidence, of the facts contained therein ( see, Cramer v. Kuhns, 213 A.D.2d 131, 136; Kaiser v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 170 Misc.2d 321, 326; cf., CPLR 4520).

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.