Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SCHNEIDMAN v. TOLLMAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 9, 2001

The motion court properly held that plaintiffs have standing to interpose their amended complaint, since their individual claims are separate and independent from a claim on behalf of the partnership (see,MK W. St. Co. v. Meridien Hotels, 184 A.D.2d 312, 313). The motion court also properly found that plaintiffs' amended pleadings were not time-barred, since they relate back to the original complaint, merely adding "additional factual detail" (see, State of New York v. St. James Nursing Home, 128 A.D.2d 694, 695).