- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SCHNEIDMAN v. TOLLMAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 9, 2001
The motion court properly held that plaintiffs have standing to interpose their amended complaint, since their individual claims are separate and independent from a claim on behalf of the partnership (see,MK W. St. Co. v. Meridien Hotels, 184 A.D.2d 312, 313). The motion court also properly found that plaintiffs' amended pleadings were not time-barred, since they relate back to the original complaint, merely adding "additional factual detail" (see, State of New York v. St. James Nursing Home, 128 A.D.2d 694, 695).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.