Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BROWN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 5, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the sentence imposed was not the sentence originally promised, and that the court should have afforded him an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. However, since the defendant did not seek to withdraw his plea or move to vacate the judgment, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Churby, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Nov. 20, 2000]; People v. Pike, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Oct. 16, 2000]; People v. Walters, 273 A.D.2d 418; People v. Gayle, 224 A.D.2d 710). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that the sentence imposed was the one promised to the defendant.