PEOPLE v. BRUNSON

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of improper comments made by the prosecutor during summation. However, the challenged statements were either fair comment on the evidence adduced at trial or fair responses to the defense counsel's summation (see, People v. Cook, A.D.2d [2d Dept., Apr. 16, 2001]; People v. Garcia, 273 A.D.2d 402; People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953) and, in any event, without merit (see generally, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133).