SNEDDON v. DOUGLAS

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment upon proof sufficient to show that, while the defendant Scott Douglas was attempting to park his car in a parking lot, the car suddenly accelerated, striking the infant plaintiff. The defendants failed to make a sufficient showing of a non-negligent explanation for the accident. Douglas admitted that the transmission of his vehicle was faulty, and that he had known of its tendency to slip out of gear for at least two years prior to the accident. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; cf., Schuster v. Amboy Bus Co., 267 A.D.2d 448; Liana v. Atacil Contr., 212 A.D.2d 673).

BRACKEN, P.J., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.