PEOPLE v. CONTI

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the comments he made at sentencing did not call into question the voluntariness of his pleas. Therefore, the Supreme Court was not under a duty to inquire, sua sponte, into the validity of his pleas, or to offer him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas before imposing sentence (see, People v. Jackson, 273 A.D.2d 937; People v. Riley, 264 A.D.2d 689; see generally, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662).

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.