KJELLGREN v. KJELLGREN

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to change custody of the parties' children without conducting a hearing. A parent who seeks a change of custody is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make an evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see, DiVittorio v. DiVittorio, A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 7, 2001]; Matter of Miller v. Lee, 225 A.D.2d 778). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in finding that the father failed to meet his threshold burden of proffering sufficient evidence to warrant a hearing to determine whether, under the totality of the circumstances, a change of custody would be in the best interests of the children (see, DiVittorio v. DiVittorio, supra; Hom v. Hom, 270 A.D.2d 391).

The father's remaining contention is without merit.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.