Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. PHILLIPS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Dec 21, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 160.10) in connection with the late-night robbery of a 94-year-old man in the man's home. We reject the contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status ( see, CPL 720.20 [a]). Despite defendant's limited involvement in causing injury to the victim, the violent nature of the crime is sufficient reason to deny defendant's request ( see, People v. Woods, 239 A.D.2d 630, 631, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1103). We decline to exercise our power to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see generally, CPL 470.15 [a]; cf., People v. Shrubsall, 167 A.D.2d 929, 930). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.