- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. PATTERSON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 28, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to move to vacate his plea (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Passero, 222 A.D.2d 858). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. McCann, 289 A.D.2d 703 [3d Dept., Dec. 13, 2001]; People v. Rowe, 284 A.D.2d 796; People v. Otero, 199 A.D.2d 342).
SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.