Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. HARDY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 20, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for an adjournment of the sentencing hearing (see CPL 390.50[a], 400.21; People v. Singleton, 41 N.Y.2d 402; People v. Melvin, 223 A.D.2d 604; People v. Russo, 172 A.D.2d 295, 296).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.