- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
IN THE MATTER OF KAGNO v. KAGNO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jul 1, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the mother's contentions, the Family Court properly determined that the Hearing Examiner providently exercised her discretion in denying the request for a further adjournment of the hearing on her motion to restore a prior application to the calendar and in dismissing that motion upon her default. A request for an adjournment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and its determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see Wolosin v. Campo, 256 A.D.2d 332).
SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.