- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. TAYLOR
NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1.
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Michael Taylor appealed from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of (1) possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and (2) fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer. On appeal Taylor challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found as a result of a search warrant obtained and executed by law enforcement. Taylor asserts the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient to establish the requisite probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant.
[¶ 2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Alert