IN THE MATTER OF DABBENE v. DABBENE

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court's determination that, based on a preponderance of the credible evidence, the former wife committed a family offense, warranting the issuance of the order of protection (see Family Ct Act § 812; 832; Matter of Hogan v. Hogan, 271 A.D.2d 533).

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court's failure to hold a dispositional hearing does not require reversal (see Matter of Annie C. v. Marcellus W., 278 A.D.2d 177; Matter of Quintana v. Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130; cf. Matter of Alice C. v. Joseph C., 212 A.D.2d 698).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.