Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN RE ROYOT, 2002-2623 (La. 1/10/03)

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan 10, 2003

Not considered. As to petitioners Nathalie Royot, Veronique Marty, and Celine Moguen, there has been no showing that their qualifications for admission have changed since this Court denied their prior applications. In the absence of such showing, this Court will not consider a new application from these petitioners. As to petitioner Guillaume Jarry, the application is premature, as there is no indication petitioner has applied for admission to the Committee on Bar Admissions. See Supreme Court Rule XVII.

JLW

PFC

CDK

BJJ

JPV

CDT

JTK