INTEL CORPORATION v. BROADCOM CORPORATION

SUE L. ROBINSON, United States District Judge

At Wilmington, this 3rd day of March, 2003;

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion for reconsideration or certification (D.I. 817) is denied for the following reasons:

1. The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to "correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Max's Seafood Café ex-rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, a court may alter or amend its judgment if the movant demonstrates at least one of the following: (1) a change in the controlling law; (2) availability of new evidence not available when summary judgment was granted; or (3) a need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice. See id.

2. Defendant has failed to demonstrate any of the aforementioned grounds to warrant a reconsideration of the court's February 13, 2003 order.