Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DAVIS v. MALDONADO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Aug 11, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to restore the action. A case dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 may be restored only if the plaintiff demonstrates both a reasonable excuse for the default in failing to appear at the conference and a meritorious cause of action ( see Syed v. Fedor, 296 A.D.2d 399). Since the plaintiff demonstrated both, the motion was properly granted.

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.