Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. ARROYO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 20, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By failing to make specific objections, the defendant failed to preserve his present contentions regarding the prosecutor's opening statement and summation ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.