- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
TAYLOR v. SAAL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 17, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To be relieved of their defaults, the defendants were required to establish both a reasonable excuse for each default and a meritorious defense ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Eretz Funding v. Shalosh Assocs., 266 A.D.2d 184, 185). The defendants failed to meet either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.