Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. DORMAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Mar 19, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10) and two counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1], [2]). The general unrestricted waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his present contentions concerning the severity of the sentence and the denial of his request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737; People v. Hines, 261 A.D.2d 959; People v. Wagoner, 234 A.D.2d 831). In any event, those contentions lack merit. Defendant received the agreed-upon sentence, and County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Williams, 307 A.D.2d 760, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 625).