- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROGERS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 17, 2004
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's pro se motions pursuant to CPL 30.30. There is no evidence in the record that the People's statement of readiness on July 21, 2000, was not made in good faith or did not reflect an actual present state of readiness ( see People v. Wilson, 86 N.Y.2d 753; People v. Kendzia, 64 N.Y.2d 331, 338; People v. Santana, 233 A.D.2d 344). Therefore, there was no violation of the defendant's rights pursuant to CPL 30.30.
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.