IN THE MATTER OF ROMAN v. ROMAN

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that his petitions for modification of his child support obligation were premature.

To the extent that the father requests that this court vacate or nullify a separate order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 4, 2000, we lack jurisdiction to review such order as the father did not appeal from it ( see Palumbo v. Palumbo, 298 A.D.2d 373).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.