HAAS v. QUEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. (N.D.Ohio 2004)

JAMES GWIN, District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant the State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 36], to which Plaintiffs Rachel, Carol, and Richard Haas have responded [Doc. 43] and Defendant the State of Ohio has replied [Doc. 46]. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

Also pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion to Amend Pleadings [Doc. 43]. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion to Amend is DENIED.