PEOPLE v. JORDAN

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of due process and a fair trial. However, the majority of the defendant's current objections are not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v. Brownridge, 267 AD2d 318). In any event, the prosecutor's statements constituted fair responses to remarks made by the defense counsel during summation ( see People v. Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821; People v. Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v. Ryant, 278 AD2d 345).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.