EVANS v. ELLIS

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention on appeal, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying her motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint ( see CPLR 3025 [b]; Leszczynski v. Kelly McGlynn, 281 AD2d 519, 520; Heckler Elec. Co. v. Matrix Exhibits-N.Y., 278 AD2d 279; cf. Pirrotti Pirrotti, LLP v. Estate of Warm, 8 AD3d 545, 546; Fuentes v. City of New York, 3 AD3d 549, 550).