Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

KELLEY v. EDISON TOWNSHIP

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
Jul 19, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER

WILLIAM H. WALLS, District Judge

ORDERED that Defendant Chris Engram's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One and Two and GRANTED on Counts Three through Eight; Defendant Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Five and then GRANTED in part and DENIED in part on Counts Six through Eight;

Defendant Fred Lacik's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six, Seven and Eight, and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five; Defendant Michael Palko's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Six and Count Eight and DENIED on Count Seven; Defendant Edison Township's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Five and DENIED on Counts Six through Eight; Defendant Jeff Diakunczak's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six and Eight and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five and Count Seven; Defendant Brian Mieckowski's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six and Eight and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five and Count Seven; and Defendant Jeff Abrams's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six, Seven and Eight, and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five.