- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. MOORE
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Sep 27, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Anthony James Moore appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Moore argues: (1) he was improperly required to register as a sexual offender for life under a statute that does not apply to him; (2) he was required to register as a sexual offender erroneously because he is "actually innocent"; and, (3) he was denied due process by being sentenced to pay restitution without receiving notice.
[¶ 2] Moore's claims are frivolous and completely without merit. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.