- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HENNING v. RITZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 11, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence before the Supreme Court was sufficient to establish that the plaintiff placed the marking purporting to be the signature of a Family Court Judge on the subject document, which constituted civil and criminal contempt ( see Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [6]; § 753 [A] [2]; Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, 59 NY2d 574; Ketchum v. Edwards, 153 NY 534; Dalessio v. Kressler, 6 AD3d 57, 65-66).
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.