- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. COLLIER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 12, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to counsel at an investigatory lineup ( see People v Wilson, 89 NY2d 754; People v LaClere, 76 NY2d 670; People v Coates, 74 NY2d 244). The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see People v Ortiz, 31 AD3d 580). Here, the court's determinations were supported by the record. Thus, the court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the identification testimony.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.