- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
GOLDBERG v. BIERMAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 26, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants sufficiently established that they were residents of Nassau County rather than Queens County ( see CPLR 503 [a], [d]), and that the alleged malpractice occurred in Nassau County. The plaintiffs failed to adequately rebut this showing in their opposition papers. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' respective motions to transfer the venue of the action to Nassau County ( see CPLR 510; Magrone v Herzog, 304 AD2d 801; Pasley v St. Agnes Hosp., 244 AD2d 469).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.