Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ARAUZ v. BELL

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.
Aug 24, 2007
ORDER

ALETA TRAUGER, District Judge

The Court has before it defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 32), a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 55) from the Magistrate Judge urging that the motion be granted, plaintiff's timely objections (Docket Entry No. 56) to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendants' response (Docket Entry No. 59) to the plaintiff's objections.

The Court has reviewed these pleadings de novo and, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, finds that the plaintiff's objections lack merit. Therefore, the plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND APPROVED in all respects. The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Bell, Colson, Castile and Love (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.