NARKIN v. LOGSDON

JOHN BAILEY, District Judge

On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff [Doc. No. 14] and plaintiff's Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15]. Plaintiff moves to have an attorney appointed to represent him pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and plaintiff also moves for more time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by defendant, Joseph France.

Upon review of the above, the Court does not find sufficient grounds to support the Motions. Accordingly, the Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff is DENIED, and the Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record herein and the pro se plaintiff.