- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
UPS v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 25, 2008
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the petition for allowance of appeal is DENIED.
Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.
SAYLOR, Justice, dissenting.
Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would allow the appeal to determine whether an order, which is otherwise final under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c), must nevertheless be deemed non-appealable because it arose in the setting of a proceeding under Section 510(c) of the Public Utility Code.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.