Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JONES v. BELLINGER

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Mar 12, 1912
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

8132

Attorney(S)

Mr. W.H. Townsend, for appellants, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220. Mr. G. Duncan Bellinger, for infant appellants, cites: Infant defendants are contingent remaindermen: 10 S.C. 372, 376. On the main question: 99 Ill. 11; 97 Md. 679; 54 S.C. 513; 2 S.C. 78; 21 S.C. 530; 69 S.C. 469, 3 Metc. 155; 58 Ind. 101; 92 N.Y. 446. Mr. James H. Hammond, contra, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220; 74 Conn. 630; 76 Conn. 586; 47 Mo. 105; 4 Rich. 46; 52 S.C. 88; 85 S.C. 439; 29 Ala. 571; 4 Rich. Eq. 300; 1 At. R. 82; 172 U.S. 491; 35 S.C. 314.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

March 12, 1912. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE WATTS.

This is an appeal from a decree of Judge Shipp confirming in a short order the report of H.L. O'Bannon, Esq., master for Barnwell county, made in the above case. The report of master should be printed in the case.

For the reasons set out by the master in his able report we think there was no error in Judge Shipp's decree confirming the same, and adopt it as the decree and judgment of the Court, under the authorities quoted in said report and his conclusions.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x